2025-11-11 11:00

As I sit down to analyze the UAAP Basketball 2023 standings, I can't help but reflect on how this season has been one of the most unpredictable in recent memory. Having followed collegiate basketball in the Philippines for over a decade, I've witnessed numerous championship runs and heartbreaking defeats, but this particular season stands out for its dramatic twists and unexpected team performances. The final standings tell a compelling story of resilience, strategy, and sometimes pure luck that determined which teams would advance to the playoffs and which would face early elimination.

Looking at the complete team rankings, National University emerged as the dominant force this season, finishing with an impressive 13-1 record in the elimination round. Their consistency throughout the tournament was nothing short of remarkable, especially considering they dropped their opening game against University of the Philippines. I remember thinking after that first loss that they might struggle to recover, but coach Jeff Napa's squad proved me completely wrong by rattling off 13 consecutive victories. Their defensive schemes were simply masterful, holding opponents to just 68.3 points per game while forcing an average of 18.5 turnovers. The Bulldogs' backcourt duo of John Lloyd Clemente and Steve Nash Enriquez provided the perfect balance of scoring and playmaking, combining for nearly 30 points per contest. What impressed me most about NU was their depth - they had at least eight players contributing meaningful minutes every game, which proved crucial during their incredible winning streak.

The battle for the remaining playoff spots created the most drama I've seen in years. De La Salle University secured the second seed with a 10-4 record, thanks largely to their explosive offense that averaged 82.5 points per game. Having watched them develop throughout the season, I believe their turnaround after a mediocre first round was the coaching performance of the year. University of the Philippines, the defending champions, claimed the third spot with a 9-5 record, though they never quite reached the dominant form we saw in their championship run last season. Their struggles were particularly evident in their perimeter shooting, which dropped to just 28.3% from beyond the arc compared to last season's 35.6%. The Fighting Maroons had to rely heavily on their veteran big men, which worked against most teams but exposed their lack of offensive versatility against elite defenses.

The final playoff position went to Ateneo de Manila University with an 8-6 record, marking their narrowest margin for qualification in recent memory. Frankly, I was surprised they managed to secure that fourth spot given their inconsistent performances throughout the season. Their offense often looked stagnant, particularly in half-court sets where they averaged just 0.82 points per possession. What saved their season was their ability to win close games, going 5-2 in contests decided by five points or fewer. The Blue Eagles' veteran experience in pressure situations ultimately made the difference in several crucial matchups during the second round of eliminations.

The middle of the standings featured Far Eastern University at 6-8 and University of Santo Tomas at 4-10. FEU's season was particularly frustrating to watch because they clearly had the talent to compete with the top teams but couldn't string together consistent performances. Their defensive lapses in crucial moments cost them at least three winnable games that would have put them in playoff contention. UST showed flashes of potential with their young core, but their inexperience was evident in late-game situations where they committed an average of 5.2 turnovers in the final five minutes of close contests.

At the bottom of the standings, Adamson University (3-11) and University of the East (1-13) faced disappointing campaigns that highlighted significant roster deficiencies. Adamson's offensive struggles were particularly glaring - they failed to reach 70 points in nine of their fourteen games. UE's lone victory came against UST in the first round, but they never built any momentum from that upset win. Their defensive rating of 112.3 was the worst in the league by a significant margin, which explains why they lost several games by blowout margins.

The reference to deputy coach Pat Aquino's statement about a player's groin injury resonates deeply with my observation that health management played a crucial role in this season's outcomes. "Sumasakit yung groin niya, kaya we decided not to play na lang him muna," Aquino remarked about one of his key players, and this conservative approach to injury management likely prevented more severe roster issues for several teams. From my perspective, the teams that succeeded this season were those that managed their players' minutes effectively and avoided rushing injured stars back into the lineup. We saw multiple instances where teams lost crucial games because they were missing key contributors, particularly in the back half of the schedule when fatigue and accumulated minor injuries started taking their toll.

What fascinates me about analyzing these standings is how they reflect the strategic evolution of UAAP basketball. The traditional powerhouses can no longer rely solely on recruiting advantages, as evidenced by Ateneo's struggle to maintain their dynasty. Meanwhile, programs like NU have demonstrated that sustained development and systematic coaching can elevate a team from middle-of-the-pack to championship contender within a few seasons. The parity we witnessed this year, with six teams remaining in playoff contention until the final two play dates, suggests the league is becoming more competitive than ever before.

As I reflect on the complete picture of UAAP Season 85, the standings tell a story beyond wins and losses. They reveal programs at different stages of development, coaching philosophies clashing on the court, and the unpredictable nature of collegiate athletics where a single injury can derail an entire campaign. The teams that adapted best to adversity, managed their rosters most effectively, and maintained consistency through the grueling 14-game schedule ultimately earned their positions in the upper tier of the standings. While NU's dominance was certainly impressive, the tight race for the remaining playoff spots provided the most compelling narrative of the season and sets up what should be an fascinating postseason tournament.